F
Fausto
League Administrator
⭐ x1
🔱
🥉
good guys
Jun 18, 2019 12:54 PM
Aerith wrote:
we will do 4v4 in the rematch
tg fausto fax and slob are ready
I heard Fax is a little stressed and may not make it.
Aerith
Advisor
⭐ x8
👑
good guys
Jun 18, 2019 12:56 PM
Fausto wrote:
I heard Fax is a little stressed and may not make it.
it's cael's time to step up
E
Emperor
Jun 18, 2019 1:04 PM
Mecca wrote:
I'm not sure how this appeal was granted, FU vs So troll was 7s week one because FU only had 7. What's the different circumstances? Just because BB isn't a bitch like backs? This will not change the outcome nor did it affect the inevitable thrashing FU will put on BW. Waste of time for everyone invo ...
@Chris
But playing the match at 8v8 wouldn't have affected the outcome if we're being honest. So I think this appeal is beyond silly.
@Judas/BB
Your match was 7v7 too? It would appear this appeal is granting a special circumstance counter to how the rule has been enforced since its inception.
Champion
Webmaster
👑 x24
👑
Gentlemen CO
Jun 18, 2019 1:06 PM
You specifically denied FU to use me as an NT which meant it should have played 7v8. You can keep saying you would have done it differently "had you known" but I told you in PM you were doing it wrong and you ignored me.
E
Emperor
Jun 18, 2019 1:07 PM
Anyways. I've said my peace on this. H. Staff want to give Backs a second chance, that's on them. My apologies to FU. Had I known this was an issue. I obviously would have just let you use a NT so we could have avoided this whole mess. I figured since no one else has appealed in 3 seasons and been granted a rematch, this would be no exception.
E
Emperor
Jun 18, 2019 1:08 PM
Champion wrote:
You specifically denied FU to use me as an NT which meant it should have played 7v8. You can keep saying you would have done it differently "had you known" but I told you in PM you were doing it wrong and you ignored me.
And I told you this is how I have been enforcing the rule since I've been a ref.
Why would I listen to you considering the number of matches that have been played under my interpretation of the rule?
C
Cross
OP
⭐ x1
⭐
👑
Gentlemen
Jun 18, 2019 1:10 PM
Champion wrote:
You specifically denied FU to use me as an NT which meant it should have played 7v8. You can keep saying you would have done it differently "had you known" but I told you in PM you were doing it wrong and you ignored me.
WOW... so Chris a top advisor in this game was ignored... All because he wanted to cater to FU... this is just sickening.
C
Cross
OP
⭐ x1
⭐
👑
Gentlemen
Jun 18, 2019 1:13 PM
And top of all this... I am banned from TWO matches???????? When the rules clearly state ONE MATCH BAN... So just because I annoyed you I get two match ban? Like plz rethink what you're doing. Seriously. ban me for the rematch OR the week 3 match... But not both... thats just not right.
C
Cross
OP
⭐ x1
⭐
👑
Gentlemen
Jun 18, 2019 1:14 PM
You have 0 proof I specced, you didnt see it happen. You dont know what happen, you're going based off the word of several bias people who hate me and then you choose to ban me for 2 games?... If anything it should only be ONE game ban... LIke wtf dude.
E
Emperor
Jun 18, 2019 1:14 PM
Cross wrote:
WOW... so Chris a top advisor in this game was ignored... All because he wanted to cater to FU... this is just sickening.
How did I cater to FU by letting them play 7v7 instead of 8v8?
Explain it to me.
No one has been able to answer this question.
How was BW wronged by playing 7v7 instead of 8v8?
Aerith
Advisor
⭐ x8
👑
good guys
Jun 18, 2019 1:16 PM
please stop arguing, this is stressing me out
C
Cross
OP
⭐ x1
⭐
👑
Gentlemen
Jun 18, 2019 1:16 PM
Emperor wrote:
How did I cater to FU by letting them play 7v7 instead of 8v8?
Explain it to me.
No one has been able to answer this question.
How was BW wronged by playing 7v7 instead of 8v8?
Chris wasn't going to play... There was no NT they could have used that was on free agent list. Follow the rules bro. It would have to have been played 8v7 like Chris and the others have said. So yes, you did screw us over.
E
Emperor
Jun 18, 2019 1:19 PM
3.2 Players who wish to NT must be on the Free Agents list on the USLZone.com website and not part of any other active squads under any alias. This is to enable quicker roster checks by the Referees.<b><u> This rule can be declared void by the Referee if the Referee determines it is necessary.</u></b>
And as I told Chris, you, Fairfax, and Fausto Sunday night I did not determine it necessary and the match would be played 7v7.
Edit: and since I have a log of Fax saying he would let Chris NT and Chris agreeing to NT - the match would have never been 8v7.
Edited Jun 18, 2019
B
BB
⭐ x1
🤝
Phenylephrine HCI CO
Jun 18, 2019 1:19 PM
Cross wrote:
You have 0 proof I specced, you didnt see it happen. You dont know what happen, you're going based off the word of several bias people who hate me and then you choose to ban me for 2 games?... If anything it should only be ONE game ban... LIke wtf dude.
So now I am biased towards you? I am one of the few people who fought tooth and nail to get you in this league. I saw you spec out just south of the north base while someone was shooting you from the top about to kill you. I WATCHED IT WITH MY OWN EYES. Hell in the video I am the one who called you out for speccing. Stop the nonsense and move on and be grateful it isn't more than it is and that you got this bullshit rematch.
C
Cross
OP
⭐ x1
⭐
👑
Gentlemen
Jun 18, 2019 1:21 PM
BB wrote:
So now I am biased towards you? I am one of the few people who fought tooth and nail to get you in this league. I saw you spec out just south of the north base while someone was shooting you from the top about to kill you. I WATCHED IT WITH MY OWN EYES. Hell in the video I am the one who called you ...
Im mainly talking about r and the other idiots. how am i getting a two match ban though? Thats absurd... SO EMP chooses to void one rule that fucks my team in the asshole but then choose to CHANGE a rule and ADD a match to my ban? Like wtf is this?
C
Cross
OP
⭐ x1
⭐
👑
Gentlemen
Jun 18, 2019 1:24 PM
7.10 SPEC-ON-PURPOSE: A player that specs on purpose to avoid a death, get more ammo, etc. will be specced for the rest of the match and will receive a one-match ban. The opposing squad will be granted 2 kills, and the offending squad will lose a player slot for 5 minutes. Referees: please make certain that the player, without a doubt, specced on purpose. If a player is found to be speccing consistently in multiple matches, the League Administrator will decide the punishment (most likely a match ban or season ban).
7.11 SPEC-ON-ACCIDENT: If a player specs or frames when they were sure to be killed, a kill will be awarded to the opposing team. The Referee and/or Staff has discretion. If a Ref or Staff member did not see it happen, a kill won't be awarded.
1. Even if its been determined i did spec on purpose (which i didnt), it clearly states its either a ONE MATCH BAN or a SEASON BAN... EMP chose a TWO match ban... Wtf is this?
B
BB
⭐ x1
🤝
Phenylephrine HCI CO
Jun 18, 2019 1:27 PM
"If a player is found to be speccing consistently in multiple matches, the League Administrator will decide the punishment (most likely a match ban or season ban)."
2nd time offense dude. Just stop it seriously, you had a leg to stand on for the appeal you got it, you don't have one to stand on for the spec out. It was obvious what happened and a ruling has been made. Accept that you got your rematch and your team gets a 2nd chance to beat FU and stop doing stupid shit in matches.