That's what I've been trying to do the whole time. Thx Sammy. About time someone understands. I'll post my ratings formula later and have it implemented

The one full game you played in with your "best stats" was against SA in a 10v10. I wouldn't call those stats good.

And your "best stats" came against Legends. Point being?

The Autism is Strong in this Thread

I'd take 27 kills in an 8v8 versus 18 kills in a 10v10, especially since Legends is statistically the better squad.

Your stats don't warrant a better rating than Y. He played the full games and got the full credit for his wins which factor into the rating. It's like playing a match in any other online game. You won't get the full exp points for a win if you don't play the full game. Only partial.

Champions ratings rule all. You have been deemed unworthy therefore you shall not be adjusted.

ER's ratings*

my rating on site doesn't reflect my true skill, if you could just bump me to like a 96 or even 95 ill be okay with that. thx in advance

love,
leak

enable html in profile settings so I can make a cool profile banner :)

It might be better to have it effect competition rating than overall rating. Playing the first 15 minutes of a game, a player goes 8-1, the team is winning but he has a better score than most of his team. The player is subbed out. The player's team still wins after the fact. That player gets less credit for the win? I understand players who play a full game should receive all the credit but a player that made an impact was subbed out should not be penalized that much.

Well that will eventually be the case once competition is figured out. That's some kind of statistician shit that I'm not familiar with. So I'm waiting for ER to hire a chinese man to help us.

This isn't as big as people are making it out to be honestly. Player's ratings have not changed that much. The only big impacts were people like Rob Zomby who played the legends blowout game as med and still had a 90+ rating after missing the next 2 games.

The sky isn't falling. This can all be adjusted/tweaked once we get a bigger sample size.

This can all be adjusted/tweaked once we get a bigger sample size.

Or once your rating drops half a point.
LOL

What does that even mean? My rating hasn't moved. I didn't even touch the formula portion and I've played all the games so my rating wouldn't even be affected by this.

em4 butthurt over some text on an online game profile.

Champ what do you mean once we have a bigger sample size? A sample would be taking a piece from the whole population.

I have a degree in this - just ask for help if you need it.

So last week you were like a 95.something.
Stats were put in and you dropped to a 90.something.
You "fixed" the rating formula again and jumped to a 93.something.

Then saying I'm "butthurt" over online text because you can't take being called out.
But it was fun (:

Again, rating formula remains unchanged. Only thing added was the penalty. Ratings for people who have played more than 60% of the games were not changed. Not sure what exactly you're "calling me out" on.

So, technically my "rating" should not have changed. 1.9/3 = 63%. But it did.

Now go change all your text to read 65% and change the penalty real quick. And edit all your posts.

Wait, why are ratings such a big deal? It literally means nothing.

Good catch em4. Was a typo in the code. 7 instead of a 6. BRB EDITING EVERYTHING TO SAY 70 INSTEAD OF 60.

em4 takes his online game ratings pretty serious fausto.